Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. City of Clarinda

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Page Circuit Court. Action for a personal injury received by plaintiff by falling upon a sidewalk, by reason of the- same being obstructed by snow and ice, and dangerous to travel, as is alleged. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Rothrock, Ch. J.

The defendant filed a motion for a new-trial, one ground of which was the alleged misconduct of one-of the jurors who tried the case. The motion was supported, by three affidavits, one of which is as follows: “ I, W. C. Stillians, on oath, do say that I am a resident of Clarinda, and', that I am acquainted with Horace Pratt, who was a member-of the jury that tried the cause of N. C. Ridenour v. The City of Clarinda that shortly before the said cause was submitted to said jury, and while it was pending, I was present with him in John Burrows’ drug-store, in Clarinda, and'while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stafford v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Ensign v. HarneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foedisch v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Skeen v. SkeenUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. McNider v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Walker v. DaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API