Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Henderson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur B. Curran, J.

This matter involves: A motion to consolidate the three above-entitled actions; a cross motion seeking dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint as against the defendant, Norman L. Worth; and a cross motion requesting an order amending the caption of action No. 1 nunc pro tunc.

With regard to the motion to consolidation, neither the attorneys appearing on the return date of the above-entitled motion, nor any other attorney and/or attorneys have opposed the motion to consolidate. Therefore, the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate the three aforesaid actions is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. . MangamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. State Bank of Albany v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cascone v. BrennanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API