Legal Opinion

Alston v. Midland Credit Management

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 11, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02196Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael A Alston, No. CV-25-02196-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Midland Credit Management, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pro se Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff “fails to 16 understand the two-step process required by Rule 55.” Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 17 1471 (9th Cir. 1986). To the extent that Plaintiff seeks default judgment pursuant to Rule 18 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the request is premature. Plaintiff has not 19 applied for entry of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Ullico Casualty Company v. Abba Shipping Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API