Legal Opinion

People of the Living God v. Chantilly Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1968No. 2589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

When this case was originally before us we refused to consider the District Judge’s ruling sustaining Defendants’ exception of improper cumulation of actions, coupled with the dismissal of Plaintiff’s suit, without prejudice, on .the ground such a ruling was interlocutory and not appealable. See La.App., 197 So.2d 748.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, limited to the question whether or not such a ruling was appealable. 250 La. 982, 200 So.2d 666.

The Supreme Court later held that the ruling was appealable and should have been considered by us, and remanded the case *446to us for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People of Living God v. Chantilly CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Thalheim v. City of GretnaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People of the Living God v. Chantilly Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People of Living God v. Chantilly Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abadie v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Borenstein v. Joseph Fein Caterers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Indian Bayou Hunting Club, Inc. v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. WellsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API