Legal Opinion

Klarman v. Haraszti

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 1975No. 390, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The interesting question presented in this appeal concerns the right of a motorist facing a yellow traffic signal to enter an intersection and the interplay of that right with the right of a motorist entering from the opposite direction and making a left turn therein. We hold that a motorist facing the yellow light is entitled to enter the intersection and having thus entered the intersection legally is entitled to proceed through regardless of a change in the traffic signal from yellow to red during the course of his passage.

The rights and duties of parties at intersections controlled by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Jones v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Thompson v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Fuentes v. PanellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haraszti v. KlarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Shaver v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API