Legal Opinion

Southern Casualty Co. v. Fulkerson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1930No. 12312PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Rehearing.

The appellant casualty company presentá an insistent motion for rehearing. The substance of its contention is that notice given by it of its want of consent to abide by the final ruling and decision of the Industrial Accident Board, together with its subsequent institution of suit in the proper court, coupled with the appearance and answer of appel-lee Fulkerson, brought before the court all parties to the litigation, including the Century Indemnity Company, by virtue of section 5, of article 8307 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and provided that the trial in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Hoxie v. Farmers & Mechanics National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lewis v. American Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Southern Casualty Co. v. FulkersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API