Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Marshall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. Civil No. 3116Published

1Dissent

LOCKWOOD, J.,

Dissenting. — I regret to say 'that I cannot concur with the majority opinion of the court in this case, as it seems to me to be ill-founded, both on authority and principle. That opinion, stated in a few words, is that the action of a committing magistrate, denying or granting bail on a murder charge, is res adjudicata, when in favor of the defendant, but not when it is against him. I discuss first the authorities.

It is a well-known fact that our Penal Code was in most part taken from that of the state of California, and the decisions of that state .on such provisions of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ex parte JilzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Adkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Ex Parte Dave AugustineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API