Legal Opinion

Hanchett Bond Co. v. Glore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston County. —Hon. Arch B. Davis, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, P, J.

— This is one of several suits brought by plaintiff ag’ainst various lot owners to recover of the owners of each lot their proportionate part of the expense of paving a street in Chillicothe, Missouri. While all of the suits were pending, a stipulation was duly entered into by all the parties thereto that one of of them, namely, Case No. 21, 999, Hanchett Bond Co. v. Palm et al., “shall be tried and submitted to the court” and that the other pending cases (including the one now before us), “shall abide the final result of the said above entitled cause, viz., No. 21, 999, it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heirs of Nat. Watrous v. McKieTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Dowling v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. City of St. Joseph ex rel. Gibson v. HaxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Kemp v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huegel v. HuegelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. In Re Marriage of EbingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Cramer v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Hammonds v. HammondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API