Shore Ex Rel. Welborn v. Shore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentSeawell, J.
Plaintiff’s objection to defendant’s cross action cannot be taken by demurrer ore tenus when the cause comes on for trial, since the objection does not go to the statement of a cause of action or the jurisdiction of the court. C. S., 518; Baker v. Garris, 108 N. C., 219, 225, 13 S. E., 2; Poovey v. Hickory, 210 N. C., 630, 631, 188 S. E., 78; Gurganus v. McLawhorn, 212 N. C., 397, 183 S. E., 844. That question is therefore not properly before us, but under our liberal practice, and quite within the limits of our statute on procedure, the cross action should be entertained. C. S., 519, 521.
*806I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poovey v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Dawson v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Adams v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.