Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Adler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 14, 2013No. SC11-1863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Russell Samuel Adler be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for thirty days. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

For the reasons more fully explained below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact, as well as her recommendations that Respondent be found guilty of violating the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We disapprove the referee’s recommendation that Respondent be suspended for thirty days. Considering Respondent’s improper conduct, and especially his false…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. The Florida Bar v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Florida Bar v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Erwin RosenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. The Florida Bar v. Byron Gregory PetersenSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API