Legal Opinion · Dissent

Toro v. Malcolm

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1978Published

1DissentFuchsberg, J.

A matter of great public interest indeed is involved in this case. It is that a statute not be unnecessarily interpreted in a manner resulting in the unconscionable treatment of members of the public.

Peter Toro, a New York City Corrections Officer who enjoyed a blameless prior record, was suspended as the immediate result of criminal charges brought against him on the basis of an incident unrelated to his employment. After a flawed trial produced a conviction, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in an opinion in which it minced no words, found that Toro’s arrest had been the result of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. In re MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Matter of ObergfellNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. City of Rye v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Verona Central Cheese Co. v. . MurtaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API