Legal Opinion

Menginie v. Savine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1952No. Appeals, 57 and 62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Claimant has been thwarted in his efforts to obtain payment of workmen’s compensation for permanent injuries and total disability resulting from his becoming impaled on the spikes of an iron fence in a fall in the course of his employment. Claims arising under similar circumstances on and after January 2, 1952, the effective date of amendatory Act No. 481, will not be subject to such improvident delay. The amendment to the Workmen’s Compensation Act provides that “the referee or the board shall forthwith order payments to be immediately made by the defendants or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Cranshaw Construction Inc. v. GhristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Ace Tire Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Kieffer v. Walsh Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API