Legal Opinion

United States v. Reitmeyer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2004No. 02-5151PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

The government appeals the district court’s dismissal of its indictment on statute of limitations grounds. The indictment charged certain companies and five company officers with “executing] and attempting] to execute a scheme to defraud the United States and to obtain money from the United States by false pretenses” in violation of the Major Fraud Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1031(a). Exercising jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. 1

I. Background

We recite the following factual allegations as they appear in the superseding indictment. The…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Vinal S. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. QayyumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Edwin David Wood, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Akm LLC v. Secretary of Labor, Dept. of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. AmbortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. KilkennyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API