Legal Opinion
David M. Fink v. James Gomez, Director, of California Dept. Of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1998No. 97-55716Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
139 F.3d 904
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
David M. FINK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
James GOMEZ, Director, of California Dept. of Corrections,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-55716.
D.C. No. CV-96-02652-JSL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Decided Feb. 23, 1998.
Submitted February 9, 1998.**
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. DupnikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Alfred R. DYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. GoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990