Legal Opinion

Claim of Vinovrski v. Innovative Chemical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 28, 2006, which, among other things, discharged the Special Disability Fund from liability under Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8).

Claimant sustained a work-related injury in November 2001, and his claim for left forearm and neck injuries, consequential *1267complex regional pain syndrome, thoracic outlet syndrome and consequential depression was thereafter established. In August 2003, the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier (hereinafter collectively referred to as the carrier) sought reimbursement from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Roland v. Sunmark IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Masotto v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Claim of Adams v. Owens Corning FiberglassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Ceplo v. Raymond Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Matter of Ricci v. Maria Regina ResidenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API