Legal Opinion

State v. Werner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 2007No. A06-1378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Respondent Robert Joseph Werner was lawfully stopped and arrested on an outstanding felony warrant on charges of tax evasion. As police spoke with Werner, they observed indicia of intoxication and, without first giving him a Miranda warning, asked if he had been drinking. Wer-ner’s affirmative response led to the administration of field sobriety, preliminary breath, and Intoxilyzer tests, all of which Werner failed. He was thereafter charged with misdemeanor fourth-degree driving while intoxicated under Minn.Stat. §§ 169A.20, 169A.27 (2004). Following an omnibus…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. TibiatowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API