Legal Opinion
Davis v. Henderson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 81-4007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
The magistrate has recommended dismissing this pro se civil-rights complaint as frivolous and malicious. I concur, and add the following.1
Plaintiff2 is awaiting trial in state court *409on the charge of attempted rape.3 In connection with that prosecution, plaintiff brings this civil-rights action against his landlord, the victim of the alleged rape attempt, an assistant district attorney, District Attorney Rendell, Police Commissioner Solomon, Mayor Green, and Governor Thornburgh.
The factual allegations set forth two grievances. First, plaintiff alleges that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Carroll Leppo, United States of America v. Leppo, CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Davis v. RendellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Nash v. ReedelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamid v. State of MichiganDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023