Legal Opinion

Reizen v. Florida National Bank at Gainesville

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 1970No. M-238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECTOR, Judge.

Appellant, defendant below in a suit to foreclose certain chattel mortgage and security instruments, seeks reversal of an order denying a motion to set aside an order of commitment, writ of attachment, and order holding him in contempt, all of which resulted from his refusal to comply with the trial court’s order requiring him to deliver certain personal property to the *31receiver appointed in the foreclosure action.

The gist of appellant’s motion to set aside the above referenced orders was that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter such orders inasmuch as the order upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Odum v. MorningstarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Coe v. FinlaysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  3. Ginsberg v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. State ex rel. Avery v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Frank v. AmaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Prime Orlando Prop. v. Dept. of Business Reg.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. GroomsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Bussey v. LEGISLATIVE AUDITING COMMITTEE OF LEGIS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. In Re Estate of BrughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Nicholson v. NicholsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API