Manship v. Newton Et Ux.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
July 11, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by After protracted litigation in the case of Manship v. Newton, reported in 94 S.C. 260, 77 S.E. 941, the plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant, H.H. Newton, for $8,000. On this judgment only $1,000 was paid. The defendant, H.H. Newton, was examined in supplementary proceedings, and arrested under the act of arrest and bail, and held under bond of $8,000, A nulla bona was returned in the case, and an action commenced for the purpose of setting aside a deed of conveyance from H.H. Newton to his wife, Kate M. Newton, of certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knobelock v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Lenhardt v. PonderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Steinmeyer v. SteinmeyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Manship v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Townes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. ErwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937