Legal Opinion
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Debuf
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 26, 1990No. 1:20-mcr-00006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATTIN, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defense, Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, and Motion to Strike Demand for Jury Trial. Plaintiff has also moved to strike a supplemental memorandum filed by defendant after the time that the other motions were argued, deemed submitted and taken under advisement. After full and careful consideration of the various motions, the Court now rules as follows.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff initiated this foreclosure action in the Montana State District Court, Fourteenth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Molsbergen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Gray v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Harper v. Federal Land Bank of SpokaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Corporex Properties, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. L.R. Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- The Federal Land Bank Of Spokane v. L.R. Ranch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991