Legal Opinion
The Pinar Del Rio
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 10, 1927No. 151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The libel is drawn as for a cause of action arising under the general maritime law, and against a vessel of the United States. There is no allegation of the now admitted truth that the steamer was British, no reference to any statute, and it is not alleged that the vessel was unseaworthy.
It is useless to predicate anything on such pleadings, and as no point has been made of their infirmity we shall consider whether, on the facts proven and under any applicable law, libelant has a case.
In order to recover it must appear (1) that there exists a good cause of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The Hanna NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Clark v. Montezuma Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gambera v. BergotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- The MagdapurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- The James E. FerrisDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- The Hanna NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.