Legal Opinion

Hayhurst v. Romano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 1997No. 97-751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPE, Judge.

The appellant former wife appeals a post-dissolution order denying her petition to change the names of the parties’ minor children. We affirm.

During the parties’ marriage, the appellant wife and appellee husband retained their respective surnames, Hayhurst (wife) and Romano (husband). The parties’ two children were given the husband’s surname, Romano, by which they were known throughout the marriage.

Several months after the parties’ 1996 dissolution of marriage, the former wife filed a petition seeking to change the names of the minor children, ages four and seven, to a hyphenated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lazow v. LazowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leadingham ex rel. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Coolidge v. UlbrichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Wilson v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API