Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Marvel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1896No. 2,137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Gavin,. J.

Appellee filed her complaint to have a default set aside and to be permitted to answer and defend against the complaint of appellant, under section 399, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (396, Horner’s R. S. 1896).

She showed a good defense to his complaint and that while summons had been regularly issued for her and returned, duly served by copy, at her residence, yet the sheriff had in fact left the copy at her son’s residence instead of her own, the son being a co-defendant, and the officer acting under the belief that it was the son’s wife who was named therein.

Appellee’s ignorance of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Blue v. Capital National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Nash v. CarsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Nietert v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Cully v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kolb v. RaisorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Groff v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API