Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Pool

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1888No. 6288PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Bosque. Tried below before the Hon. J. M. Hall.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

Appellant was sued by appellee for damages for injury to his land and crops of cotton and oats adjoining the track of the railway of appellant caused by alleged negligence in its construction of a bridge, and an embankment north of the bridge, whereby the waters of Heil’s creek, when swollen by rain, were thrown over the adjoining fields, washing away the soil and destroying the growing crops thereon. The petition described the situation of the land, the dimensions of the embankment, the want of culverts and sluices and the width of space left at the bridge in its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gulf, Col. & S. F. R'y Co. v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Soules v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tignor v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Libby v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  4. Albers v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Shotwell v. CrierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API