Legal Opinion
State v. Pinkham-Murch
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 7, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Defendant Kay Pinkham-Murch appeals from her conviction by a Superior Court (Androscoggin County) jury for aggravated forgery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 702 (Supp.1980), asserting that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree and accordingly reverse her conviction.
In July, 1975, defendant moved to Maine from Massachusetts, where, following her graduation from college, she had had over ten years’ experience as consultant and manager in the telephone industry. In the fall of 1976, she met Maurice Rodrigue, a neighbor who for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. LeClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. McEachernSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. MorrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- United States v. FlynnDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Daniels v. Narraguagus Bay Health Care FacilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Daniels v. Narraguagus Bay Health Care FacilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012