Legal Opinion
CHEUNG
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1971No. 2106PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2106 MATTER OF CHEUNG In Deportation Proceedings A-15171770 Decided by Board November 30, 1971 Where respondent, after stating his name and that he understood the charge brought against him, refused to testify at his deportation hearing, deport- ability under section 241 (a) (2), Immigration and Nationality Act, is es- tablished by clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence on the basis of (a) the identity of names of respondent and of the crewman who is the sub- ject of documents which were in possession of the Service before respondent's apprehension (seaman's Identity…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ah Chiu Pang v. Immigation and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Juan Quilodran-Brau v. J. W. Holland, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Vlisidis v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Herminia Venus Valeros v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Joseph Doto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.