Cunningham v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Scott Circuit Court; Daniel Ron, Judge; statement by the court. W. R. Cunningham was indicted for the offense of receiving money in -a hank for the credit of a depositor with the knowledge that the hank was insolvent, contrary to section 1814 of Kirby’s Digest.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Scott Circuit Court; Daniel Ron, Judge; statement by the court. W. R. Cunningham was indicted for the offense of receiving money in -a hank for the credit of a depositor with the knowledge that the hank was insolvent, contrary to section 1814 of Kirby’s Digest. The facts are as follows : Some time in the early part of the year 1911, I. H. Cunningham, brother of the defendant, approached E. A. MeEiaehin, cashier of the Bank of Midland, for the purpose of buying the bank. No agreement was reached on that date. The defendant was not present. I. H. Cunningham, in company with ibis…
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The defendant was indicted under section 1814 of Kirby’s Digest, which is as follows: “No bank shall accept or receive on deposit, with or without interest, any money, bank bills or notes, or United States treasury notes, bills or drafts, circulating as money, or currency, when such bank is insolvent ; and any officer, director, cashier, manager, member, party or managing party of any bank who shall knowingly violate the provisions of this section, or be accessory to, or permit or connive at the receiving or accepting on deposit of any such deposit, shall…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Darragh Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Skarda v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Chapman v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Hill v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.