Legal Opinion

Dunaway v. Terry

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate an order requiring security for costs.

1Opinion of the CourtGildeksleeve, J.

The motion is made hy the plaintiff to vacate an order, obtained ex parte, requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs, on the ground of nonresidence. This motion is based on the claim that the defendants have been guilty of laches in making their demand for such security. The rule is well settled that the absolute right of a defendant to compel a nonresident plaintiff to give security for costs is waived, unless it is asserted before answer ; and an application to compel such plaintiff to give security for costs, which is made after the service of the answer, is addressed to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson, Hull & Co. v. McNallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tedeschi v. Bacigalupo, New York County Courts1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API