Long Meadow Homeowners' Ass'n v. Harland
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentCarlson, Presiding Justice
¶ 25. Because I disagree with the majority’s application of equitable estoppel in this matter, I respectfully dissent. The one issue raised in the petition for writ of certiorari is whether the chancery court and the Court of Appeals erred in applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Specifically, the Long Meadow Defendants contend that the chancery court and Court of Appeals failed to consider the testimony of landowners who relied on representations made by the Leavells that all lots in Long Meadow would be subject to the same restrictive covenants and that only single-family,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- PMZ Oil Co. v. LucroyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- BC Rogers Poultry, Inc. v. WedgeworthMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Powell v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.