Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Sommer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Appellant and her late husband sponsored an offering plan to convert the 360-unit residential apartment building known as “The Sovereign” to cooperative ownership. By the terms of the sixteenth amendment to the plan dated April 14, 1981, the sponsor increased the purchase prices for all unsold apartments. That amendment also contained the following provision: “However, each tenant is granted the non-exclusive right to purchase his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weiss v. KarchNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kowalchuk v. StroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- LIN Broadcasting Corp. v. Metromedia, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- LI Equity Network, LLC v. Village in Woods Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- ALH Properties Ten, Inc. v. 306-100th Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.