Legal Opinion
Dickson v. Simpson
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
Complainant, a resident of Shelby county, Tenn., charged that West Memphis Gin & Supply Company, “a nonresident corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Arkansas,” with its “principal office in Crittenden County, West Memphis, Arkansas, is indebted to complainant in the sum of $500.00 ; that the nonresident Gin Company has” a deposit in a sum of money in excess of $500 with the Bank of West Memphis, which is a nonresident hanking corporation doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Arkansas; that said nonresident Bank of West Memphis, in turn,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- MacOn County Livestock Market, Inc. v. Kentucky State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Glazer v. First American National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Overby v. OverbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
- McDaniel v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.