Dale v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentRabinowitz, Chief Justice
While I concur in this court’s resolution of the impermissible data issue, I cannot agree with the court’s holding regarding the deportation issue.
At sentencing, Dale’s counsel urged that the objectives of sentencing could be best served by imposing a limited period of incarceration in light of the deportation.1 Although the superior court considered the Chaney goals of rehabilitation, reinforcement of social norms, isolation, and deterrence in imposing a sentence of incarceration, the court never mentioned Dale’s pending deportation. Knowledge that the defendant may be deported is one of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrews v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Ian Paul Briscoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Szeratics v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. TuckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1978