Legal Opinion
Subaru of New England, Inc. v. General Ship Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 14, 1992No. Civ. A. Nos. 91-12323-WF, 90-12592-WF, 90-13094-WF and 91-10923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT (# 43)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant General Ship Corporation (“General Ship”) opposes the Motion For *579Leave To Amend Complaint (# 43) filed by Subaru of New England (“Subaru”) primarily on the ground that Subaru, by delaying the filing of the motion, has foreclosed General Ship from filing a third-party claim against the United States because of the statute of limitations applicable to claims against the Government.
The case involves damage to cars owned by Subaru which were stored on an outside lot near General…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arthur Araujo v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket Steamship Authority v. New England Telephone Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Honour Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Corning Glass Works, Third-Party v. Puerto Rico Water Resources Authority, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Central Rivers Towing, Inc. v. City of BeardstownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loeber v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Barnstable County v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017