Legal Opinion
Burns & Russell Co. of Baltimore v. OLDCASTLE
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 15, 2001No. AMD00-3019PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the Burns & Russell Company of Baltimore and Southeast Capital Corporation (together “the plaintiffs” or “B & R”), have instituted this damages action alleging state common law breach of contract claims and federal and state statutory claims against the following 11 defendants: (1) Oldeastle, Inc.; (2) CRH, pic; (3) Amcor, Inc.; (4) Oldeastle Architectural West, Inc.; (5) Oldeastle APG West, Inc.; (6) Oldeastle APG National, Inc.; (7) Tren-wyth Industries, Inc.; (8) Superlite Block, Inc.; (9) Oldeastle Precast, Inc.; (10) Old-castle Architectural,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- David T. Combs Sarah E. Combs v. James O. Bakker Tammy Faye Bakker Richard DortchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Elpidio Mendez v. Richard N. Elliot, Individually and in His Official Capacity the City of Gaithersburg, Maryland Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rao v. ERA Alaska AirlinesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- William v. AES Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Pegues v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Burns & Russell Co. of Baltimore v. OLDCASTLEDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Burns & Russell Co. v. Oldcastle, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.