Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Ross v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1952No. 32122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The defendant, Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, filed objections in the county court of Carroll County to the application of the county collector for judgment for the sale of real estate for the nonpayment of taxes for the year 1948, levied for educational purposes by school districts Nos. 72, 73, 200, 201, and 204. From a judgment overruling its objections, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Like People ex rel. Ruchty v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co. 408 Ill. 480, and People ex rel. Ross v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co., ante, page 60, this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ruchty v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Village of Morgan Park v. KnopfIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kramer v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People ex rel. Sweet v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People Ex Rel. Sweet v. CEN. ILL. P. SER. CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API