Legal Opinion

National Oleo Meter Co. v. Jackson

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided January 7, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by the national Oleo Meter Company against Walter M. Jackson, tocona pel defendant to assign to plaintiff certain letters patent, and for other and further relief.

Read the full summary

Appeal from special term. Action by the national Oleo Meter Company against Walter M. Jackson, tocona pel defendant to assign to plaintiff certain letters patent, and for other and further relief. The complaint alleged that the defendant and a certain corporation known as the “Standard Hydro-Carbon Machine Company” had entered into an agreement by which it was agreed, among other things, that-the said company would purchase from said Jackson all the inventions he liad then made, or should thereafter make, in relation to the use of gas in any form, and should pay him therefor in advance, by…

1Per curiam

The findings of facts are warranted by the evidence, and" the conclusions of law are warranted by the findings of facts. We are of the-opinion that Exhibit A did not contain thé whole agreement between the parties. The agreement between the parties is Exhibit X, and w'as offered in evidence by the plaintiffs. By that agreement the defendant bound him-self to assign to the Standard Hydro-Carbon Machine Company all the patents that he then had, upon the payment to him of the sum of $110,000. It does not appear that the said Jackson ever received said sum of $110,000. As the-payment of this sum…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. BlairNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API