Legal Opinion
Plumb v. State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1990No. 900012Published
1Opinion of the Court
809 P.2d 734 (1990)
Dolly PLUMB, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v.
STATE of Utah, et al., Defendants.
Malcolm A. Misuraca, Haley & Stolebarger, Douglas B. Provencher, and Beyers, Costin & Case, Appellants.
No. 900012.
Supreme Court of Utah.
December 10, 1990.
Jackson Howard, Leslie W. Slaugh, Provo, for appellants.
Craig G. Adamson, Stewart M. Hanson, Jr., Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and appellees.
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Appellants Malcolm A. Misuraca, Haley & Stolebarger, Douglas B. Provencher, and Beyers, Costin & Case (collectively "class counsel") seek an award of attorney fees consistent with a…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.