Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Harlin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1931No. 5580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenwood, J.

Upon the authority of Walcott v. Kershner (Tex. Com. App.) 291 S. W. 195, 196, the El Paso Court of Civil Appeals sustained a recovery of $468 and interest thereon for breach of a covenant in a deed by plaintiffs in error to defendant in error that a certain tract of land was free of encumbrances, when it was at the date of the deed subject to a vendor’s lien for said sum of $468. It was neither alleged nor proven that defendant in error had lost the land or had discharged any portion of the incumbrance save accrued interest amounting to $25.77. 20 S.W.(2d) 158.

The writ of error was granted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cooper v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Hoyt Post v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Rancho Bonito Land & Live Stock Co. v. NorthTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Thomas v. EllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Wolff v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Press v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API