Legal Opinion
Krimstock v. Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 15, 2006No. Docket No. 05-6691-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff class challenges the seizure and detention of vehicles by the City of New York. This appeal is taken from the most recent order issued in this long-running litigation, the December 6, 2005 “Amended Order” of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mukasey, C.J.), insofar as the order allows a district attorney to decide unilaterally that a vehicle seized pursuant to a warrantless arrest should be retained as potential evidence for a criminal proceeding. For the following reasons, we conclude that due process requires…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krimstock v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Coastal Communications Service, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Krimstock v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- McKithen v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. WarsameDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.