Legal Opinion

People v. Curtis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1985No. 83—2339, 83—2395 consPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Defendants James Curtis and Andrew Ryder were found guilty of armed robbery in a bench trial. We reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial because of the violation of defendants’ sixth amendment right to counsel after adversarial judicial proceedings had been initiated against them and because of the exploitation of the results of that constitutional violation at trial.

On July 18, 1979, two men entered a liquor store at about 10 p.m., near closing time. They pretended to be customers and then wielded guns and removed a gun from a part-time security guard, Fred Kennie. They also took…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. LasleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. DoveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. MacOnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API