Pate v. State

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of one of the offenses denounced by Code 1923, Sec. 4925 — removing or selling personal property for the purpose of hindering, delaying, or defrauding a person who had claim thereto under lien created by law for rent or advances.

Appellant complains that the general affirmative charge to find in his favor should have been given to the jury. But we do not find that any such charge, in writing, was requested by him. So of course the court was not in error in this regard. Henderson v. State, 137 Ala. 83, 34 So. 828. As said in the opinion in the case cited: “It…