Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaminski

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided December 7, 1990No. NMCM Nos. 892722, 892480, 893970, 893287, 891536, 892460, 893574, 894230, 900509, 893825, 894226, 892501, 894228, 892608, 894229, 893548, 893352, 892455, 900381, 884991, 893353, 893657 and 893272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Each of the above-captioned cases contains a waiver of appellate review but was, nonetheless, forwarded for appellate review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866, and *809Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1203, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, because the waiver of appellate review was deemed ineffective by reason of having been filed before the accused or defense counsel was served with a copy of the action of the convening authority, in presumptive violation of R.C.M. 1110(f)(1).

Although the phraseology of R.C.M. 1110(f), as a whole,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HernandezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API