United States v. Kaminski
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Each of the above-captioned cases contains a waiver of appellate review but was, nonetheless, forwarded for appellate review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866, and *809Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1203, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, because the waiver of appellate review was deemed ineffective by reason of having been filed before the accused or defense counsel was served with a copy of the action of the convening authority, in presumptive violation of R.C.M. 1110(f)(1).
Although the phraseology of R.C.M. 1110(f), as a whole,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HernandezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991