Legal Opinion

VRATSINAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Chitwood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 2012No. A11A1698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dillard, Judge.

After suffering an injury while working for a subcontractor on a construction project, Vincent Chitwood filed a civil tort action against Vratsinas Construction Company (“VCC”), the general contractor for the project. Following the denial of its motion for summary judgment, VCC appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in ruling that Chitwood’s tort claims against VCC were not barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. For the reasons set forth infra, we reverse the trial court’s denial of VCC’s motion for summary judgment.

At the outset, we note…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright Associates, Inc. v. RiederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Warden v. Hoar Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Haygood v. Home Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Ellis v. IngleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Dutton v. Georgia Associated General Contractor Self-Insurers Trust FundCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. McCREACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Williams v. Johnson.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Navy Federal Credit Union v. Pearl McCreaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. River Place at Port Royal Condominium Association, Inc v. Shelisa SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  5. VINICIO A. DIAZ ARRIOLA v. KEITH COLEMANCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API