Legal Opinion

Dennick v. Scheiwer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1955No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

In this action for trespass the plaintiff declared (a) for damages under the Death Statute of 1851, P. L. 669, 12 PS §1601, and (b) for damages on a survival action. The verdict was for the defendant. The case for the plaintiff consisted in (1) circumstantial evidence, which of course was for the jury, and (2) alleged admissions of the defendant made by him to police officers at the scene of the accident. The defendant denied the testimony of the officers. The plaintiff ashed for a new trial on the ground that the defendant was permitted to testify generally, i.e.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank And Trust Company v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Linebaugh v. LehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Gibbs v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Mohney v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Younginger v. HecklerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API