Legal Opinion

Connally & Shaw v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Donley County; J. N. Browning, Judge. Action by J. H. Saunders against Connally & Shaw. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellee, Saunders, filed this suit in the district court of Donley county, and by his second amended original petition it would seem that he intended to ask for the rescission of a contract for the sale of what is termed “a crude oil burner agency contract,” and to recover $351.50 paid thereon by reason of the breach of said contract on the part of appellants in failing to deliver said agency contract, and also for damages for fraud and deceit.

Appellants’ proposition under the first assignment of error is: “Where an amended petition sets up a cause of action differing materially from that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Riggins v. TrickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. McLane v. BelvinTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. El Paso Development Company v. RavelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Hoyt v. First Nat. Bank of ChesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Maddox v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Seimer v. James Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1924
  5. Beckwith v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API