Legal Opinion

State v. Nabb

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 10, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING SECOND APPLICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

TATUM, Judge.

This is the defendant’s second application for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9, T.R.A.P. The defendant desires to appeal a judgment of the trial court that affirms the order of the District Attorney General denying pretrial diversion. The previous application sought the same relief.

In the previous application, it was demonstrated that the defendant was charged with three counts of selling Schedule VI controlled substances. The first application adopted the statement of reasons given by the trial court for giving…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. NabbCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API