Legal Opinion

Pacific Bank, Ltd. v. Gomes

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1927No. 1699Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error moves for taxation of costs. The only item in its bill which is disputed is a charge of $237.00 for “transcript of evidence paid to official court reporter.” Ordinarily, and in the absence of a contract to the contrary, the expense incurred in procuring a transcript of the evidence necessary for the' consideration of an appeal is taxable as costs in favor of the prevailing party. Robinson v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co., 20 Haw. 467, 468; Tyler v. Wise, 21 Haw. 166; Magoon v. Lord-Young Co., 23 Haw. 187. The undisputed facts in this case are, however, that after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magoon v. Lord-Young Engineering Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tyler v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Robinson v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Scott v. Kona Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API