Legal Opinion

Poore v. Simpson Paper Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2009No. 05-36060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on September 22, 2008 and appearing at 544 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 2008), is withdrawn. Pursuant to General Order 5.3.a, a new opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order. With the withdrawal of the prior opinion, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc may be filed.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide a dispute about retirement benefits.

I

Simpson Paper Company (“Simpson”) owned and operated the Evergreen Mill in West Linn, Oregon, from 1990 until 1996, when it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Frances Alday v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Alday v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Camarillo v. Balboa Thrift and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  5. Frances Alday v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API