Legal Opinion

Bulwinkle & Co. v. Cramer & Blohme

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Before Kershaw, J., Charleston, November, 1886. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This was an action against the defendants, “Cramer & Blohme,” for $1,138.70, damages sustained upon a lot of shelled corn in sacks, purchased from them by the plaintiffs on May 17,1884. The following writing was offered as the written contract of the parties:

“May 17th. Sold H. Bulwinkle & Co.—
“5,000 bu. mixed sacked corn @ 71-|- c.
“1,000 “ “ “ “ @80Jc.
“Schooner shipment payable on arrival. No Avharfage.
“(Signed) Cramer & Blohme.”

At the time the purchase was made the corn was .not in the city, but soon after, about the last of May or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Stalnaker v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Griffin v. BristleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Cape Fear Lumber Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Huguenot Mills v. Jempson & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API