Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated July 26, 1984, which directed that a hearing be conducted to determine the receiver’s claim for reimbursement for necessary expenditures.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposi*192tion of a motion does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and therefore is not appealable as of right (see, De Santis v De Santis, 107 AD2d 734; Warner v Warner, 88 AD2d 639; Bagdy v Progresso Foods…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bagdy v. Progresso Foods Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Warner v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. De Santis v. De SantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API